Cle Elum Limit Reduction - blame me!

Talk all about trout here.
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Post Reply
User avatar
Mike Carey
Owner/Editor
Owner/Editor
Posts: 7765
Joined: Sun Apr 01, 2007 10:56 am
Location: Redmond, WA
Contact:

Cle Elum Limit Reduction - blame me!

Post by Mike Carey » Thu Aug 15, 2013 5:03 pm

I spoke earlier this week with John Easterbrooks, Regional Fish Program Manager for the Yakima Region, which includes Cle Elum lake. Specifically, I was concerned about the future of the kokanee fishery as I read that the lake was no longer being stocked with kokanee and they were really focusing on getting the sockeye to become a harvestable run.

John was incredibly helpful and informative. He told me some interesting facts. He said WDFW had stopped stocking Cle Elum in 2007 and that the kokanee my wife and I caught were in fact sockeye smolts that had acclimated to the lake, either not able to find the smolt escape pipe, or, deciding to stay in the lake. He said the lake has no natural reproduction of kokanee that WDFW is aware of. So these kokanee are actually kokanee/sockeye. Pretty interesting stuff!

Then he dropped a bombshell on me. He said that after seeing a fishing report posted online of a guy holding up a nice stringer of kokanee, and reading the report that this guy, Carey, and his wife had caught a bunch of nice, fat kokanee, that he had decided to amend the emergency rule change to reduce the lake limit to statewide rules of five fish, including trout. He said he felt that since the kokanee were so healthy sized that five a day was plenty. He also indicated that by making the lake limit 5 trout, including kokanee, it now allows anglers to take up to five lakers a day. WDFW definitely would like to see the laker population reduced significantly to protect the sockeye smolts.

I laughed and told him that report was from me and my wife. We fished 7/2 and the amended emergency reg was posted 7/11. I had no idea this web site had such influence, LOL!
Guilty.jpg
Guilty.jpg (47.24 KiB) Viewed 1971 times
Image

"Takers get the honey, Givers sing the blues".

User avatar
Bodofish
Vice Admiral Three Stars
Posts: 5407
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 12:59 pm
Location: Woodinville
Contact:

Re: Cle Elum Limit Reduction - blame me!

Post by Bodofish » Fri Aug 16, 2013 4:50 am

5 Lakers a day! That makes the drive a little less painful.
Build a man a fire and he's warm for the night. Light a man on fire and he's warm the rest of his life!

User avatar
The Quadfather
Rear Admiral One Star
Posts: 3868
Joined: Tue May 08, 2007 2:27 pm
Location: Carkeek Park, North Seattle
Contact:

Re: Cle Elum Limit Reduction - blame me!

Post by The Quadfather » Fri Aug 16, 2013 11:47 am

Glad as well about the laker count. Thanks for these interesting updates lately on Cle Elum, will be watching the rise of the Sockeye closely =P~

User avatar
reelinanrockin
Petty Officer
Posts: 48
Joined: Sun Jun 10, 2007 11:02 am
Location: Pacfic, wa

Re: Cle Elum Limit Reduction - blame me!

Post by reelinanrockin » Sun Aug 18, 2013 7:12 am

So one guy in the department has the power to change the limit. But when we want to get a rule change on a fisheries we must move the mountain and told no can do. I am thinking the hatchery Kokanee in lake Samamy comes to mind.

Post Reply