Legalities of WDFW Police personal property search
Forum rules
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Forum Post Guidelines: This Forum is rated “Family Friendly”. Civil discussions are encouraged and welcomed. Name calling, negative, harassing, or threatening comments will be removed and may result in suspension or IP Ban without notice. Please refer to the Terms of Service and Forum Guidelines post for more information. Thank you
Re: Legalities of WDFW Police personal property search
Yes you always have to show catch and gear if asked.
- Lip_Ripper87
- Petty Officer
- Posts: 27
- Joined: Sat May 26, 2012 11:33 pm
- Location: Lexington, Wa
- Contact:
Re: Legalities of WDFW Police personal property search
We'll done gassyboy. Thank you for taking a legit ament approach to this question. Wiki, is NOT a legitment source of information. The site is a open source. What that means is that you or I can get on there and make any changes or type and publish anything we want. So please people, when talking about something a s serious as this, please for the love of god, DONT USE WIKI! Lol Again, thank you Gassyboy for doing the proper research.
Fishing is the life of past, present, and hopefully future. We must keep it a live! C&R!
Re: Legalities of WDFW Police personal property search
Just remember, probable cause is VERY EASY to establish. All they have to say is that poaching activity is high in that area and you were in that area and were acting suspicious. Done deal.
In Arizona, the deputy sheriffs submitted in court that if they "asked" to search and you refused, that was probable cause. You must be engaged in some suspicious activity if you don't want them to search. This was challenged when a deputy wanted to search a home so he acted like he wanted to use the phone. The homeowner refused to let him in, so he claimed probable cause and searched the home. The case was dismissed, but the trend continues with very loose interpretations of "probable cause".
In Arizona, the deputy sheriffs submitted in court that if they "asked" to search and you refused, that was probable cause. You must be engaged in some suspicious activity if you don't want them to search. This was challenged when a deputy wanted to search a home so he acted like he wanted to use the phone. The homeowner refused to let him in, so he claimed probable cause and searched the home. The case was dismissed, but the trend continues with very loose interpretations of "probable cause".
Forgiveness is between them and God. My job is to arrange the meeting!
US Army 1st SGT (Ret)
US Army 1st SGT (Ret)